Mindful Self-Acceptance? Bad Idea According to Ancient Chinese Philosophers.

Asian philosophies have proven extremely influential in the United States, but are they being interpreted correctly? Frequently not, says Harvard China historian Michael Puett, who focuses on two main ideas in this video: one transported relatively recently to the United States, and another that sheds new light on the so-called naturalistic fallacy.
First up is mindfulness meditation: a practice that has become all the rage for anyone looking to live calmer, more focussed lives. It sounds innocent enough, says Puett, but the goal of distancing yourself from negative emotion presents real risks. If you find a way to cope with negative emotion without changing the material circumstances around you — focusing on internal sources of stress to the exclusion of external ones — you may begin to accept harmful treatment.
This is likewise the case with "finding your true self," which Puett claims is little more than accepting your circumstances and normalizing potentially destructive patterns of behavior. When we search for ourselves, we search for some authentic, natural self. But putting nature on a pedestal ignores the very real call to action that Chinese philosophy presents.
Puett's latest book is "The Path: What Chinese Philosophers Can Teach Us About the Good Life"
Read more at BigThink.com:
Follow Big Think here:
YouTube:
Facebook:
Twitter:
Transcript - Mindfulness is one of the big ideas that’s come in from Asia that’s had a huge impact on America and basically the idea of mindfulness as it’s practiced in America is one of teaching one to accept one’s feelings. If one feels anger or jealousy just sort of distance oneself from it. And the goal is to allow one to move through the day not being so taken up by these negative emotions. That seems very powerful but of course the danger of such an approach is that it’s really teaching us not to make any fundamental changes in our life. It’s simply teaching us to accept and not be so bothered by things as they occur. Now Chinese philosophers will on the contrary push strongly that no, you actually don’t want to be too comfortable with the world as it is or with interactions as they are or with things you’re doing as they currently are being done. They would say oh no, you should actually be training yourself to respond in ways that can actually affect situations for the better, alter your relationships that really alter the situations you’re in. And I would even add mindfulness as it was originally practiced was actually much closer to this idea. It’s really in America that it’s been turned into a kind of acceptance mantra. Whereas a lot of the Asian philosophies and this is certainly true of China as well the focus really is on altering, changing. Changing yourself. Changing your actions. Changing the world in which we exist.
We tend to love the idea of nature. We tend to think that our problem as humans is that we’ve become too artificial and that we should return to nature in some way. Either return to nature as it exists outside of us so it means taking a nice walk in a park on a weekend for example or returning to our nature within ourselves. So to really stick to who we are, who we fundamentally are, our basic nature that we’re born with, things we’re gifted at doing and really focus on who we naturally are meant to be. Sun Tzu would argue that both of these visions of nature are actually potentially dangerous. First of all let’s begin with the self. The self, sure we’re born with lots of things but Sun Tzu would say we’re born with a lot of messy things. We’re born with desires, dispositions, faculties. And we’re all kind of equally born with a bunch of messy stuff. And the focus shouldn’t be on sticking or returning or embracing that stuff with which we’re born. The goal is actually to change yourself, transform yourself. As Confucius will say overcome this self-meaning this messy self. And train yourself to be something better than you were at birth. And Sun Tzu would even make the same point with the larger natural world around us pointing out that actually most of what we think of as natural is already quite artificial. There’s nothing natural about a park. This is an artificial attempt by humans to create a seemingly natural space.
Read Full Transcript Here: .